Tobin v. Edward S. Wagner Co., Inc
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
In the light of Gemsco v. Walling, 324 U.S. 244, 65 S.Ct. 605, 89 L.Ed. 921, 1 and especially because of the subsequent addition of Section 11(d) of the Act 2 we think the Act sufficiently broad to authorize an administrative order or regulation including homeworkers engaged in activities ■such as those who dealt with the defendant here. That was the issue presented to the trial judge and chiefly argued on this appeal. Were there no more to the case, we would affirm.
However, in a footnote in defendant’s brief, and in its oral argument, in this court, it was also argued…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Maritime Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Usatorre v. the VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1978
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Powell v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Nabisco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.