Legal Opinion
Guiseppi v. Walling
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 27, 1944No. 361-363PublishedCited by 228 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
1. Our starting point is this: Without the prohibition of home-work contained in the order of the Administrator the Act, in its application to this industry, will be unenforcible and will become virtually a dead letter. For so it was found as a fact by the Administrator, to whom the Act assigns its enforcement.2 And the truth of his findings petitioners cannot here dispute, since they do not assert that those findings are not supported by substantial evidence heard at the Administrator’s hearing. At most, some of the petitioners cite a part of the evidence which is at…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by228 opinions
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
223 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.