Legal Opinion

Neel v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1969No. 3715PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before GRAY, C. J., and McINTYRE, PARKER, and McEWAN, JJ. Mr. Justice McINTYRE

delivered the opinion of the court.

In Neel v. State, Wyo., 452 P.2d 203, we affirmed the conviction of defendants on a charge of grand larceny. They have petitioned for rehearing, asserting they were not proved guilty of a theft; that if they were to be charged with any crime, it should have been the crime of obtaining property under false pretenses; and that the evidence necessary to prove the charge of obtaining property under false pretenses is different from the evidence required to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SantoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Zarate v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Neel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Huber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Bradley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stuebgen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Newell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Wells v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Barnes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API