Legal Opinion

Huber v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHiblack, J.

The appellant, Joseph Huber, was indicted in the court below, jointly with Charles Miller, for grand larceny.

The charge was, that they had stolen fifty dollars, in Hnited States treasury notes and national hank currency, from one Joseph "Walters.

There was a trial by a jury, a verdict of guilty, fixing the punishment at five years in the state-prison, with a fine and disfranchisement, and judgment on the verdict, over a motion for a new trial.

The causes assigned for a new trial were:

1. Because the verdict is not sustained by the evidence ;

2. Because the verdict is contrary to the evidence;

3.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Smathers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Crum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bestor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Grunson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Neel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API