Herczeg v. Hampton Township Municipal Authority
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORIE MELVIN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Louise Herczeg, appeals from the trial court’s Order granting Ap-pellee’s, Bankson Engineers, Inc. (Bank-son), motion to dismiss based upon an affidavit of non-involvement filed pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7502. Appellant challenges the Order as violative of the coordinate jurisdiction rule. Alternatively, she asserts the trial court misapplied 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 7502 and erred as a matter of law in refusing to find Bankson owed the decedent a duty under the facts of this case. We affirm.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural background may be summarized as follows. In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and DevelopersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Adamski v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Huddleston v. Infertility Center of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Campisi v. Acme Markets Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Kroptavich v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Brisbine v. Outside in School of Experiential Education, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.