Legal Opinion

Herczeg v. Hampton Township Municipal Authority

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2001PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIE MELVIN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Louise Herczeg, appeals from the trial court’s Order granting Ap-pellee’s, Bankson Engineers, Inc. (Bank-son), motion to dismiss based upon an affidavit of non-involvement filed pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7502. Appellant challenges the Order as violative of the coordinate jurisdiction rule. Alternatively, she asserts the trial court misapplied 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 7502 and erred as a matter of law in refusing to find Bankson owed the decedent a duty under the facts of this case. We affirm.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural background may be summarized as follows. In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Carvalho v. Toll Bros. and DevelopersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Adamski v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Huddleston v. Infertility Center of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Campisi v. Acme Markets Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Kroptavich v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Brisbine v. Outside in School of Experiential Education, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API