Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. Cabiness
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 10, 1951No. Nos. 42499 and 42547PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHyde, J.
Actions to foreclose special tax bills. The same issue is presented in both casas. It is whether a suit under the Land Tax Collection Act (Laws 1943, p. 1029; Laws 1945, p. 1761 and p. 1926; Laws 1949, p. 602; Sec’s. 141.210-141.810, R. S. 1949) in which judgment was entered but later set aside and suit dismissed upon payment (by compromise) of the taxes involved in it, bars a prior suit to foreclose a special tax bill.
In the Buchanan case, a judgment for plaintiff was reversed and remanded by the Kansas City Court of Appeals. (Buchanan v. Cabiness, 221 S. W. (2d) 849, 851.) Upon re-trial,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Clinic & Hospital, Inc. v. McConnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Erbs v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Sanford v. Valier-Spies Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Cagle v. MonroeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Estate of Seiser v. LaskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hawkins v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- STATE EX REL. OFFICE OF PUBLIC COUNSEL v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Gebru v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ferguson v. County of JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.