Legal Opinion

Cagle v. Monroe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 1949No. 4-8918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This case involves appellant’s liability for having set his dogs upon the appellee’s cow, -which had escaped from her pasture and was trespassing upon appellant’s cotton field. There was testimony to the effect that the appellant, discovering this cow and other cattle upon his property, sicked four dogs upon the intruders. One of the dogs was a bulldog estimated by appellee to weigh about eighty pounds. This dog bit the cow so severely that her value as a milch cow was destroyed. The jury awarded compensatory damages in an amount not questioned by appellant.

For reversal appellant contends…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reinman v. WorleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bartleman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Farmers Insurance Co., Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Myers v. Clayco State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Lathrop v. RippeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Bradley v. HendricksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API