Legal Opinion

Holt v. American Progressive Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 4, 1987PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

The jury in the court below returned a verdict against the administrator of an insurance plan for fraud or outrageous conduct, punitive damages, the medical payments due on an insurance policy and a statutory bad faith penalty. The administrator asserts that it was entitled to a directed verdict on the question of liability on the policy and the fraud or outrageous conduct claim. In addition the administrator claims that the trial judge prejudiced the jury in the charge.

American Progressive Life Insurance Company is qualified to issue life insurance policies in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  2. Medlin v. Allied Investment CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Moorhead v. JC Penney Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Dozier v. Hawthorne Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England v. James E. Layne Cindy Carol Kilgore, Larry Nig KilgoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Menuskin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Keith v. Murfreesboro Livestock Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. Patton v. Estate of UpchurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API