Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Hazen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 27, 1995No. 94-189PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiff, Jayne Conrad, brought an action against the defendants, Michael Hazen, Ralph Maxwell, and The Kingdom, Inc., for injuries allegedly stemming from a sexual assault. The plaintiff appeals from a decision of the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) granting the defendants summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

*250“The trial court must grant summary judgment when it finds no genuine issue of material fact, after considering the affidavits and other evidence presented in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, and when the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lakeman v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
  2. Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. Rowe v. John DeereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. McCollum v. D'ArcySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Gardner v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. Furbush v. McKittrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. Portsmouth Country Club v. Town of GreenlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Bronstein v. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State Employees Ass'n Local 1984 v. New Hampshire Division of PersonnelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API