Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of Concord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 11, 1993No. 92-064PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiff, Beverly N. Gardner, appeals the decision of the Superior Court {Dickson, J.), dismissing her action *255against the City of Concord (city). She argues that the trial court erred by ruling that the city was immune from liability under the discretionary function exception to the abrogation of municipal immunity. Because not all of the acts or omissions alleged as negligent necessarily implicate discretionary functions, we reverse and remand.

On December 1, 1988, the plaintiff sustained personal injuries when she fell on a sidewalk on Depot Street in Concord. The plaintiff sued the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Merrill v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. ERG, Inc. v. BarnesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Ass'n v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. City of Bloomington v. KuruzovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Konefal v. Hollis/Brookline Cooperative School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Conrad v. HazenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Everitt v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Hacking v. Town of BelmontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API