Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Woodfield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 21, 1966No. [No. 393, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.
Leonard C. Bauman, an infant, by Carl M. Bauman his father and next friend, and Carl M. Bauman, individually, brought a tort action against Bradley M. Woodfield and Henry H. Woodfield, individually and trading as B. M. Woodfield & Son, and against Joseph P. Dorr and Ann C. Dorr, landowners. Trial was held before a jury, Judge Ralph G. Shure presiding, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the Dorrs, defendants-appellees, at the conclusion of the plaintiffs-appellants’ (Baumans’) case and denied a motion for a directed verdict on behalf of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Le Vonas v. Acme Paper Board Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Harper v. HiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Rowley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Williams v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Bobo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Drug Fair of Maryland, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.