Legal Opinion

Boam v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,188PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiffs were partners conducting a cleaning, repairing, and'tailoring business, and owning a stock of merchandise, show cases, shelving, hat blocks, electric irons, electric fixtures and other prop- - erty, classified apart from the stock of merchandise as fixtures. The firm was indebted on account to Barnett Cohen and to a number of other creditors. Cohen had guaranteed the accounts of two of these creditors. After some preliminary negotiations with Cohen the' plaintiffs executed and delivered to Cohen’s son, A. R. Cohen, a bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butts v. PrivettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Gray v. DelaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Hasty v. PierpontSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Estey v. HoldrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Snedker Ex Rel. Snedker v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Dodd v. BolesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API