Legal Opinion

Gray v. Delay

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Rooks District Court. REPLEVIN by Cray against Delay, as sheriff. Judgment for defendant. The plaintiff comes to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action of replevin for certain cattle and horses, alleged to be of the total value of $3,300. The case was tried by a jury, which found for the defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant for a return of the property, or, in case a return could not be had, then for $2,103, the value of the property, and for costs. The plaintiff brings the case to this court.

Y. M. Gray, the plaintiff, is the father of Irad W. Gray. The plaintiff claimed upon the trial, that on the 25th of March, 1889, Irad W. Gray, who lived at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Butts v. PrivettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boam v. CohenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. State v. HainesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Delay v. YostSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API