Legal Opinion

Concord Foods, Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1996No. 15339Published

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Concord Foods, Inc. (“Concord”) appeals from the dismissal of its appeal by the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, from a decision by the Industrial Commission of Ohio (“ICO”) denying Concord’s application for handicap reimbursement under R.C. 4123.343. Pursuant to R.C. 4123.519 (amended and recodified at R.C. 4123.512), for its appeal below Concord named as parties the appellees herein: the claimant, Michael S. York, Sr., and the administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“bureau”). Upon the bureau’s motion, the trial court found that it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cadle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API