Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Ballou

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1974No. 733SC773PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. He contends the following finding of fact was erroneous:

“The garage was built on a concrete slab on top of the ground and extended northwardly from the north wall of the basement and waterproofing could not be applied to the entire length of the outside of the north wall of the basement.”

The testimony in the record is to the effect that the garage was in fact built on a slab abutting the north wall of the house. There was, in addition, testimony that the men attempting to waterproof the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Glisan v. SmolenskeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  5. Hoye v. Century Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Berman v. Watergate West, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Thacker v. TyreeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gamble v. MainWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API