People v. Page
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The supplemental instructions which the court delivered were essentially neutral and therefore did not seek to coerce a particular juror into accepting a particular view of the facts (see People v Pagan, 45 NY2d 725, 727; People v Carter, 40 NY2d 933, 934). We have examined appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. PaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. PerfettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. LussierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. EleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.