People v. Pagan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
After deliberating for five hours and finding themselves unable to reach a verdict, members of the jury were instructed that unlike this "simple case, as far as the amount of evidence to be covered is concerned * * * some cases last months, but the Jury is expected to come to a verdict.” The court then noted that "sometimes a Jury can’t reach a verdict” and that a deadlock had in fact occurred recently in a more involved case where disagreement had continued into the second day of deliberations despite a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- People v. VidalNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. SharffNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by114 opinions
- People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Plummer v. RothwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- People v. AponteNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.