Legal Opinion

Snider v. Whitson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1960No. Civ. 18973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered after a general and special demurrer to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.

While there are four other causes of action in the complaint dealing with defendants other than defendant Whitson, the only causes of action we are concerned with are those attempted to be alleged in counts 3 and 4. Count 3 attempts to set up a cause of action in favor of plaintiff Susan Snider based upon wilful misconduct of defendant Whitson; count 4 attempts to set up a cause of action in favor of plaintiff Lorena…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berkley v. DowdsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Simmons v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Callahan v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Colich & Sons v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Semole v. SansoucieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API