Legal Opinion

Melton v. Olenik

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 20, 2008No. 4418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIEPER, J.:

Chong Son Kim (Kim) appeals the circuit court’s order denying her motion to set aside entry of default and denying relief from default judgment. We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Yoko Kim Melton (Melton) and Kim entered into an agreement in which Melton would purchase a one-half interest in Kim’s massage therapy business, “Our Place.” 1 The agreement, signed by both parties on January 9, 2002, indicates a purchase price of $30,000, due in full within one year of the date of the agreement. 2 Melton was to work in the business and learn the operations for one…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Dixon v. Besco Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Mitchell Supply Co. v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Wham v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. WiquistCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Williams v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Limehouse v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Limehouse v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API