Legal Opinion

Wham v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1989No. 1352PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., is the appellant. Norman Wham is the respondent. We address only the questions relating to the sufficiency of the summons and to the standard for granting relief from an entry of default under Rule 55(c) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. The master’s order refusing to quash the summons is affirmed; however, the master’s order denying the motion to set aside the entry of default is vacated and the issue raised by the motion is remanded for determination by the master.

Wham began this action on February 29,1988, by serving a summons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ricks v. WeinrauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Brown v. WeathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  3. Miller v. British America Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Crawford v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Besco Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. In Re Estate of WeeksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Richardson v. P v. Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Hill v. DottsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API