Legal Opinion

Mitchell Supply Co. v. Gaffney

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1988No. 1253PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This appeal presents the question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in vacating a judgment, when the neglect relied on by Respondents was their attorney’s failure to properly review pleadings delivered to him. We reverse and remand.

Appellant — Mitchell Supply Company, Inc. (Mitchell) served suit papers in two lawsuits on the Respondents (hereafter referred to as Gaffneys). One was a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action; the other sought a personal judgment on an open account. Neither lawsuit was answered and eventually default judgment was entered in the open…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simon v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Renney v. Dobbs House, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Ledford v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Ammons v. HoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tri-County Ice and Fuel Co. v. Palmetto Ice Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. McClurg v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Roberson v. Southern Finance of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API