Legal Opinion
Didden v. Village of Port Chester
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 10, 2004No. 04 Civ. 0370(CM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
McMAHON, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs Bart Didden, Domenick Bologna, Fred DeCesare, Ca bernet 119 Realty Corp., Opus 113 Corp., Pauillac 115 Realty Corp. and 117 North Main Street Corp. seek an order staying a condemnation proceeding in state court. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a dispute between private developers over a development project associated with the Village of Port Chester’s (“Port Chester”) redevelopment of 27 acres of its downtown and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Sica v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Didden v. Village of Port ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Mateo v. PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005