Legal Opinion

Mateo v. Phillips

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 21, 2005No. 03 CIV. 9941(SCR)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. Background

The factual and procedural history of this case was set forth in a companion order of this court, issued today in the matter of Town of Haverstraw v. Barreras, et. al., 04 Civ. 6073 (“Condemnation Action”). For clarity, it bears repeating that this motion addresses an order to show cause, filed by Hector Luis Mateo (the “Plaintiff’) in August 2004, alleging violations of his civil rights by the Town of Haverstraw (“Town”) and Howard Phillips (“Phillips”), the Town Supervisor (Phillips and the Town are collectively referred to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. D/B/A Tor Books v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. And Saban International N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Genesee Brewing Company, Inc., D/B/A Highfalls Brewing Company v. Stroh Brewing Company, D/B/A Northern Plains Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API