Legal Opinion

Nebraska National Bank of Omaha v. Pennock

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1898No. 8086PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, 0.

This action was begun in tbe county court of Douglas county, from which court, by appeal, it was taken to the district court, in which there was a trial without a jury and a finding and judgment in favor of the defendant. The recovery was sought by plaintiff on a promissory note in these words and figures, to-wit:

“$322.04. , Omai-ia, Nebraska, August 13, 1890.
“On the 13th day of January, 1891, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of the Patrick Land Company of Omaha three hundred twenty-two and .04 dollars, at its office in Omaha, Nebraska, with interest from this date at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Martin v. . KunzmullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Doll v. HollenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Colby v. ParkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Gaylord v. Nebraska Savings & Exchange BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. FlossOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Producers' Nat. Bank v. ElrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Fassler v. StreitNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API