Legal Opinion

Martin v. . Kunzmuller

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1867PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The firm of Graydon, McCreery Co. made a general assignment to the plaintiffs for the benefit of their creditors, on the 7th of May, 1861. At the time of making the assignment, they had a demand against the defendants for goods sold, amounting to $3,107.42; to recover which, this action is brought.

The defendants held and owned, at the time of the assignment, three promissory notes, made by Graydon, McCreery Co.; the first for $671.28, which became due April 4, 1861; the second for $998.35, which became due April 11, 1861; and the third, which had not matured at the time of the assignment, had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Myers v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Kingston Bank v. GayNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Wells v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Wolfe v. WashburnNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. Hicks v. McGrortyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Fera v. . WickhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Seibert v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. St. Louis Natl. Bank v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API