Colby v. Parker
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broad y, J. cited: A. & N. JR. Co. v. Washburn, 5 Neb., 124; B. & JMJ. IL Co. v. Lancaster Co., 7 Id., 38; Jones v. Seward Co., 10 Id., 161; Ins. Co. v.Barnd, 16 Id., 90; JR. Co. v.JLimdstrom, Id., 263. cited: Search v. Miller, 9 Neb., 30; 1 Dan., Neg.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Gage county. Tried below before Broad y, J. cited: A. & N. JR. Co. v. Washburn, 5 Neb., 124; B. & JMJ. IL Co. v. Lancaster Co., 7 Id., 38; Jones v. Seward Co., 10 Id., 161; Ins. Co. v.Barnd, 16 Id., 90; JR. Co. v.JLimdstrom, Id., 263. cited: Search v. Miller, 9 Neb., 30; 1 Dan., Neg. Iiist., sec. 812; 2 Id., sec. 1220; 1 Herman, Est. and Res Ad., 24, 38, 40; Id., 143Ó-1 ; U. P. P. Co. v. McCarty, 8 Kan., 125; Wescott v. Brown, 13 Ind., 83; Larum v. Wilmer, 35 la., 244; Knowlton v. Parsons, 10 Neb., 505.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This is an action upon a promissory note executed by Colby in favor of H. W. Parker. The answer of Colby is as follows:
“ That he admits that on the 12th day of December, A. D. 1887, he made and delivered the promissory note set forth in plaintiff’s petition, but he denies that on or about the 14th day of December, 1887, or at any other time before or subsequent to the maturity of said note, the said H. W. Parker transferred, indorsed, or delivered said promissory note to the plaintiff, and avers that the same-was not indorsed by the said H. W. Parker, and that the plaintiff is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doll v. HollenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Darst v. BackusNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Violet v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Exeter National Bank v. OrchardNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Fassler v. StreitNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Bolen v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.