United States National Bank v. Floss
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Action on a note by the United States National Bank of Portland against L. Ferd Floss. An appeal was taken by defendant from an order sustaining a demurrer to the answer.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
Action by the United States National Bank against L. Ferd Floss upon a promissory note for $639, executed and delivered by the defendant to Leaner Gray on November 1, 1892, and by her assigned to the plaintiff before maturity. The note contains the stipulation that it shall be paid “in monthly installments of fifteen or more dollars each month, together with the full amount of interest due on this note at *69the time of payment of each installment; the first installment to be paid one month from the date hereof, and the other installments monthly thereafter until the whole sum has been paid.”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chouteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Jennings v. ToddSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Davis v. . McCreadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- National Bank of North America v. KirbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Kelley v. WhitneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Taylor v. American National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hull v. AngusOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Home Credit Co. v. FouchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.