Legal Opinion

Baybank v. Pandolfino

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 6, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This is an action in contract by the plaintiffcassignee to recover payment of the principal balance on a promissory note executed by defendant Joseph A Pandolfino in conjunction with a real estate purchase. By way of affirmative defense and counterclaims for breach of contract and G.L.c. 93A damages, the defendant alleged that misrepresentations had been made at the time of his execution of the note and that the note had been fraudulently altered.

The record indicates that in 1987, the defendant and his wife, defendant Virginia F. Pandolfino, purchased four condominium units in Natick,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Tosti v. AyikMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Industrial National Bank v. Leo's Used Car Exchange, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Dow v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Loew v. MinasianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Locke v. AustinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  2. Mount v. Baypark Development, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API