Jova v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs-Appellants Tyheem Keesh and Jesus Jova, pro se and incarcerated, appeal a decision of the district court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint which alleged several constitutional violations in addition to violations of their rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. In this opinion, we address only the RLUIPA claims; the other claims are addressed in a separate summary order filed today. We AFFIRM the judgment below in part and VACATE and REMAND it in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Terry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Darnell v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Williams v. AnnucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Couch v. JabeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Lopez v. CipoliniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Graves v. Correctional Medical ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.