Legal Opinion

Jova v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 28, 2009No. Docket 08-2816-prPublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Tyheem Keesh and Jesus Jova, pro se and incarcerated, appeal a decision of the district court granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint which alleged several constitutional violations in addition to violations of their rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq. In this opinion, we address only the RLUIPA claims; the other claims are addressed in a separate summary order filed today. We AFFIRM the judgment below in part and VACATE and REMAND it in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Salahuddin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Terry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Darnell v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Williams v. AnnucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. Couch v. JabeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  4. Lopez v. CipoliniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Graves v. Correctional Medical ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API