Legal Opinion
Reichelt v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided August 2, 1996No. 2:93 cv 332PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RODOVICH, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court, on the Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Adding Counterclaims filed on behalf of the defendant, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, on April 25, 1995. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
Background
A motion for summary judgment was granted in favor of the United States Army Corps of Engineers on February 14,1996, for claims brought pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387. The facts were detailed in that Order. While that motion was pending, the Army Corps filed this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thompson v. BoggsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Herman Perrian v. James E. O'grady, Sheriff of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Rutherford Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- United States v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
- State v. Chrysler Outboard Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Chrysler Outboard Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998