Legal Opinion

United States v. Rutherford Oil Corporation

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 31, 2010No. Civil Action G-08-0231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This is an action under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1811, 1344, and the Rivers and Harbors Act (“RHA”), 33 U.S.C. § 403. The United States seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for what it alleges are five separate instances of illegal “prop washing” in East Galveston Bay between February 2003 and August 2004. “Prop washing” occurs when vessels are operated in shallow water, causing the propellers or the bottoms to disturb the bed and to redeposit the soil and other materials into other areas. The United States alleges…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Resources Protection Council v. Flambeau Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
  2. Daigle v. Cimarex Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2018
  3. Cox v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Spearfish Evans-Tonn Ditch Company v. Horizon Investments, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API