Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Chrysler Outboard Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1998No. 96-1158Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilliam A. Bablitch, J.

¶ 82. {concurring in part and dissenting in part). Because I conclude that this court should extend the discovery rule to actions brought to enforce Wisconsin's Solid Waste Law, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 83. In 1970, Chrysler Corporation knowingly violated the State’s law with respect to disposal of solid wastes. Chrysler received the State of Wisconsin Solid Waste Disposal Standards (effective May 1, 1969) on December 15, 1969 but did not hire a licensed hauler until some time in the early 1970s. The regulations, Wis. Admin. Code ch. 51, clearly and unambiguously required that generators of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Spitler v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API