Clement v. California Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff/Appellee Frank Clement, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison (“Pelican Bay”), alleges in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that his First Amendment rights were violated by Pelican Bay’s enforcement of its policy prohibiting inmates from receiving mail containing material downloaded from the internet. The district court denied the motion for summary judgment by the defendants/appellants, the California Department of Corrections and the individual corrections officials (collectively, “CDC”). The district court then sua sponte granted summary judgment for Clement and issued a permanent,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Jacklovich v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Morales Feliciano,et v. John A. RullanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Edward Jones, Jr. v. S. SladeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Nelson v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Ralph Harrison Benning v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.