Legal Opinion

Ross v. County of Bernalillo

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 28, 2004No. 02-2337PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

In this prisoner suit, plaintiff Michael Rene Ross brings Eighth Amendment claims against several defendants alleging that a slippery shower floor was unreasonably dangerous and that he did not receive appropriate medical attention after falling in the shower and injuring his shoulder. Applying a total exhaustion rule, the district court dismissed these claims without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). We agree that a total exhaustion rule applies, and we AFFIRM.

BACKGROUND

On November 29, 1999,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Hill v. CurcioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Lira v. HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API