Huelsman Ex Rel. Huelsman v. National Emblem Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
HOWERTON, Judge.
Appellants were the plaintiffs in the trial court. Appellees were the defendants along with Harry Huelsman, husband and father of the Appellants and driver of the vehicle in which they were injured. The Appellee insurance company was a party because of the uninsured motorist coverage provided in the Huelsman policy. The unknown defendant was the alleged operator of a vehicle which forced the Huelsman vehicle off the road.
The trial court dismissed the claim against the insurance company because there was no physical contact between the two vehicles. As to protection against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Jett v. DoeKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Allen v. West American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Smith v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hammon v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Hammon v. Farmers Insurance GroupIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Burton v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. ArnoldKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Burton v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.