Legal Opinion

Smith v. Allstate Insurance Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chiee Justice Dyee

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a declaratory judgment action brought by the insured, hereinafter referred to as the complainant, for a construction of certain provisions of the defendant Allstate’s uninsured motorist endorsement and the Uninsured Motorist Act of Tennessee (T.C.A. Sections 56-1148 through 56-1153). The Chancellor held that the “physical contact” requirement contained in the defendant’s policy is valid under the Uninsured Motorist Act; and that the so-called set-off provision of the uninsured motorist endorsement is likewise valid.

The case was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Lawrence v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Roloff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. Universal Underwriters, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ely v. State Farm Ins.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Ward v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API