Legal Opinion

Pisker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the Supreme Court on the verdict of a jury in the Gloucester Circuit in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.

The defendant had issued four industrial policies on the life of the decedent, Albert Baurle, two of them dated Jan- nary 2d, 1933, the third dated May loth, 1933, and the fourth dated August 28th 1933. There was also a fifth policy issued November 6th, 1933.

The insured died December 9th, 1933, and defendant paid the first two policies but refused to pay the other three, whereupon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauze v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  2. Karp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Orsini v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  4. Helm v. Sun Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Barrase v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daly v. Paul Revere Variable Annuity Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. National Life & Accident Insurance v. HouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Cole v. Atlanta Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Kizer v. Life & Casualty Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Lance v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API