Legal Opinion

Orsini v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 2, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action brought by her on a policy of life insurance issued by appellant, insuring Anna DeStefano, the mother of plaintiff.

1. Under point one of its brief, appellant urges that plaintiff below was not entitled to sue for the proceeds of the policy.

The policy provides that the insurer will “pay * * * to the executor or administrator of the insured, unless payment be made under the provisions of the next succeeding paragraph.” Then follows a facility of pajunent clause, which permits the insurer to make payment to certain persons. It has been…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Panko v. GrimesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Popowicz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Price v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Thomas v. New York Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hinnenkamp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API