Legal Opinion

Kizer v. Life & Casualty Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mary B. Kizer, individually and in her capacity as ad-ministratrix of the estate of her deceased son, Thomas Kizer, instituted this action at law in the second circuit court of Davidson county against Life & Casualty Insurance Company to recover $1,500 — $1,000, the face value of an industrial travel and pedestrian policy, issued by the company to her son, Thomas Kizer, on or about February 26, 1934, with $250 as a penalty on the ground that the company’s refusal to pay said policy was not in good faith, and $250 as reasonable…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Monahan v. Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Clay v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Kelly v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Gough v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chorney v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Golden v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. National Life & Accident Insurance v. HouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Cole v. Atlanta Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Peoples Life Ins. v. GoffsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API