Legal Opinion

Barrase v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

The action was upon an insurance policy issued by the defendant company covering the life of plaintiffs decedent. The judge, sitting without a jury, gave judgment to the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The specification of determinations sets out, and appellant’s brief argues, numerous rulings, to which exception was taken. We think, however, that the subject-matter will sufficiently appear in the discussion of appellant’s point three, which is that the trial court erred in not finding affirmatively upon the defendant’s eighth request as follows:…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Orsini v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  2. Prahm v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. New York Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Pisker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Madama v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API