Legal Opinion
Saporoso v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 3, 1992No. 14164PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The complaint in this action, as amended at the commencement of trial,1 alleged claims for the intentional infliction of emotional distress and for breach of contract arising out of the termination of the employment of the plaintiff, Eugenia Saporoso,2 by the defendants Aetna Life and Casualty Company (Aetna) and its supervisory employee, Laura Larese. After a trial of several weeks, the court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendants on these remaining counts3 of the complaint. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment, claiming there was sufficient evidence to warrant the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Marone v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Fulco v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.