Legal Opinion

Deere v. Ingram

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 27, 2006No. 05-05-00063-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WRIGHT.

Louis Deere, D.O. and Hillvale Medical Group Association d/b/a Hillvale Medical Association appeal the trial court’s judgment granting a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and rendering a take nothing judgment in. favor of Jesse C. Ingram, Ph.D. and Behavioral Psychology Clinic, P.C. (“Clinic”). In his first point of error, Deere contends Ingram waived all the grounds raised in his motion for JNOV. In the remaining five points of error, Deere generally contends the trial court erred in rendering JNOV because (a) the evidence is legally sufficient…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Meyer v. CatheyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Wagner v. Edlund, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  3. Global Water Group, Inc. v. Atchley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  4. Global Water Group, Inc. v. Atchley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API