Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Edlund

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 30, 2007No. 05-06-00477-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MAZZANT.

Clifford P. Wagner, Jr., brings this appeal from a modified judgment entered in favor of Hans and Jan Edlund. In his first two issues, Wagner challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the attorney’s fees and damages awarded in the judgment. Wagner’s third issue claims the trial court erred in denying Wagner’s motion to modify judgment and alternative motion for new trial 1 . For the reasons stated below, we conclude Wagner failed to conclusively prove his attorney’s fees and the evidence is factually insufficient to support the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Environmental Procedures, Inc. v. Guidry, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. PopCap Games, Inc. v. MUMBOJUMBO, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  3. Robert L. & Julia T. McCullough v. Scarbrough, Medlin & Associates, Inc, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. Hunter v. PRICEKUBECKA, PLLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  5. Marauder Corp. v. Beall, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API