Legal Opinion
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. ADS Group
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 2010No. 08 Civ 04068(RGS), 08 Civ 04070(RGS), 08 Civ 04071(RGS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD G. STEARNS, District Judge. 1
This breach of contract and patent infringement action brought by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and U.S. Philips Corporation (collectively, Philips) against a number of CD replicator companies, including the ADS Group (ADS), Zomax Incorporated (Zomax), Entertainment Distribution Company (USA) LLC (EDS), and Optical Experts Manufacturing, Inc. (OEM), arises out of a dispute over the scope of various License Agreements and Side Letters (the Agreements) entered between each of the defendant replicators and Philips. The Agreements pertain to a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trustees of Laborers Union Local No. 1298 v. A to E, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Pado, Inc. v. SG Trademark Holding Co LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- SF Entities Inc. v. GamburgDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Sketchworks Industrial Strength Comedy, Inc. v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022