Legal Opinion
Pado, Inc. v. SG Trademark Holding Co LLC
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 29, 2021No. 1:19-cv-06614Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------x PADO, INC. and HOMELEC KOREA CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, -against- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 19-CV-6614 (RPK) (RER) SG TRADEMARK HOLDING CO LLC, WIEDER AND FRIEDMAN ENTERPRISES, MOSHE FRIEDMAN a/k/a COY WEST, HERSCHEL FRIEDMAN, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------x RACHEL P. KOVNER, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Pado, Inc. (“Pado”) and Homelec Korea Co., Ltd. (“Homelec”), makers of the “Purewave” massage device,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.