Legal Opinion

Richards Et Ux. v. Warner Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1932No. Appeals, 330, 340, 341 and 347PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

To arrive at a conclusion in this case with justice to all parties concerned is not free from difficulty.

The defendants, Warner Company and Huggins, appeal from a finding that they were both guilty of negligence in causing injury to Grace P. Richards. We are confronted with three questions: Was she contributorily negligent? Were both defendants at fault? If both were not, was either?

Mrs. Richards and her son were riding in a one-seated Ford roadster belonging to and driven by Huggins. He had taken the son of Mrs. Richards to a dentist for the purpose of having…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Cody v. VenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Hayes Et Ux. v. SchomakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Giles v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Janeway v. Lafferty Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Holton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Purol, Inc. v. Great Eastern System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Freas v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API