Richards Et Ux. v. Warner Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
To arrive at a conclusion in this case with justice to all parties concerned is not free from difficulty.
The defendants, Warner Company and Huggins, appeal from a finding that they were both guilty of negligence in causing injury to Grace P. Richards. We are confronted with three questions: Was she contributorily negligent? Were both defendants at fault? If both were not, was either?
Mrs. Richards and her son were riding in a one-seated Ford roadster belonging to and driven by Huggins. He had taken the son of Mrs. Richards to a dentist for the purpose of having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Cormican v. MenkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Cody v. VenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Hayes Et Ux. v. SchomakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Giles v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Janeway v. Lafferty Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Holton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Purol, Inc. v. Great Eastern System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Freas v. SullivanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.