Chittenden Solid Waste District v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. (HS&G) appeals from a judgment of the Chittenden Superior Court condemning its land in Williston for use as a landfill. HS&G claims that the trial court erred by: (1) not deciding whether a publicly-owned landfill was needed in Chittenden County; (2) considering and imposing a condition on Chittenden Solid Waste District (CSWD) to make sand available to HS&G after condemnation (the “stockpile plan”); (3) excluding evidence that CSWD acted in bad faith by seeking to condemn the property; and (4) making clearly erroneous findings of fact. We affirm.
In March…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. Patuxent Valley Conservation LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Gilman v. Towmotor Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Keus v. Brooks Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Rossetti v. Chittenden County Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State Highway Board v. LoomisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012