Legal Opinion

Chittenden Solid Waste District v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 9, 1999No. 97-063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. (HS&G) appeals from a judgment of the Chittenden Superior Court condemning its land in Williston for use as a landfill. HS&G claims that the trial court erred by: (1) not deciding whether a publicly-owned landfill was needed in Chittenden County; (2) considering and imposing a condition on Chittenden Solid Waste District (CSWD) to make sand available to HS&G after condemnation (the “stockpile plan”); (3) excluding evidence that CSWD acted in bad faith by seeking to condemn the property; and (4) making clearly erroneous findings of fact. We affirm.

In March…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. Patuxent Valley Conservation LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Gilman v. Towmotor Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Keus v. Brooks Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Rossetti v. Chittenden County Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. State Highway Board v. LoomisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Travelers Insurance Company v. Susan J. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. In re Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. In re Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API