Legal Opinion
In re Chittenden Solid Waste District
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 7, 2012No. 11-072PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
111. This condemnation ease was filed in July 1992, making it very, very old. We are currently reviewing this matter for the fourth time, asked to determine whether the superior court abused its discretion when it declined to find that there had been a material increase in the value of a sand pit owned by Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Company (HS&G) between 2000 and 2009. We conclude that the superior court did not abuse its discretion, and we affirm the court’s denial of HS&G’s motion to amend the final judgment.
¶ 2. The complete factual and procedural history of this case was recited in In re…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandgate School District v. CateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Altman v. AltmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Goshy v. MoreySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re ChandlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013