In re Chittenden Solid Waste District
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. (HS&G) appeals from an amended judgment of $4 million in damages for the condemnation of its sand pit by Chittenden Solid Waste District (the District) to create a solid waste landfill. *40Following a jury verdict, the Chittenden Superior Court granted the District’s motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to V.R.C.P. 50(b). The court ruled that HS&G suffered no compensable business loss, and it set aside that part of the verdict that awarded HS&G an additional $4.8 million for business loss. HS&G argues that the court erred in granting the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rezzonico v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Chittenden Solid Waste Dist.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Appeal of Van NostrandVermont Superior Court · 2009
- Our Lady of Guadalupe Home Found., Inc. v. MassuccoVermont Superior Court · 2010