Legal Opinion

Sanderson, Thompson, Ratledge & Zimny v. AWACS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 25, 1997No. Civ. A. 96-145-LONPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LONGOBARDI, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sanderson, Thompson, Ratledge & Zimny (“Sanderson”) filed a putative class action in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware for New Castle County against defendant AWACS, Inc., d/b/a/ Comcast Metrophone (“Comcast”). Comcast removed this action to this Court. Presently before the Court is Sanderson’s motion to remand, asserting that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action.

This case is one of three separate class actions filed against Comcast in the state courts in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. The claims and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Union Ink Co., Inc. v. AT&T CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  5. Osband v. United Airlines, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API